Q1) .A builder agreed to build a house for $70,000. The builder completed all of the work. However, he failed to glaze the windows properly, with the result that the glass is likely to fall out of the windows in a moderate to strong wind. The builder found that he had no time to replace the glass, because he had started another job at the other end of the country. The owner of the house could not move into the house until the glass was replaced, so he hired a glazier to reglaze the windows, at a cost of $500. Which one of the following statements is likely to reflect the legal position? The builder substantially performed and therefore will be entitled to $69,500. None of the options given is correct. The builder will be entitled to the full contract price. The owner, by employing the glazier to finish the job, impliedly accepted the work the builder had done. The builder will not be entitled to any payment as he did not fully perform his contract. The contract was frustrated and the builder will receive an amount calculated by reference to the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943.