PLEASE HELP! VERY URGENT!
from "Edible Insects: Gross-Out or Global Food Solution?" By Dawn Starin of Yes! Magazine February 2013
Reasons to eat bugs
Today there are a billion hungry people on the planet. That number is going to grow, and the cost of food is already soaring. Over the past year, real food prices (adjusted for inflation) have risen by 33 percent, and according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, a further 20 to 30 percent increase is expected in the next ten years.

Based on a medium level of average fertility, the United Nations predicts a global population of 9.3 billion people by 2050 (a rise of more than 2 billion) and, taking into account already existing levels of malnutrition, estimates that food production will need to increase by 70 percent. Reaching that goal at today’s level of crop productivity would require at least 3.5 million square miles of new farmland.

But economist Jeffrey Sachs, the director of Columbia University’s Earth Institute, calculates at most that given environmental and practical constraints, we might be able to add only a ninth of what is needed. As it is, agriculture is already a driver of ecological problems, fueled by what appears to be an insatiable demand for meat and dairy products (not to mention the new dedication of some cropland to producing biofuels).

So where is all this much-needed food going to come from? Well, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Wildlife Fund’s website, bugs are a possible solution to the world’s growing food problem. Many provide as much protein—weight for weight—as beef or fish, so they are a possible alternative to eating meat, not only for the future sustainability of the planet, but for the sake of health as well.

Which BEST evaluates the credibility of these two sections of information?
Responses

A-The section, Why Eat Insects? would be considered more credible because it is presented in a numbered format to provide factual details clearly.
The section, Why Eat Insects? would be considered more credible because it is presented in a numbered format to provide factual details clearly.
B-The section Edible Insects: Gross Out or Global Food Solution? would be considered more credible because its data considers cultural and physiological concerns.
The section Edible Insects: Gross Out or Global Food Solution? would be considered more credible because its data considers cultural and physiological concerns.
C-The section Edible Insects: Gross Out or Global Food Solution? would be considered more credible because the content integrates information from three valid experts.
The section Edible Insects: Gross Out or Global Food Solution? would be considered more credible because the content integrates information from three valid experts.
D-The section, Edible Insects: Gross Out or Global Food Solution? contains language too informal for the content to be considered a credible source.