So, my first question then is should a judge have more latitude to intervene when she thinks an attorney is not representing his client appropriately? Right now there's hardly anything a trial judge can do about that. Should that be changed? If so, what type of procedural structure would you recommend for that process? Meaning, what facts should a judge be required to see before she can become involved? What steps should the judge be allowed to take once she is involved? Should she only provide perspective and suggestions, or should she have the power to remove the attorne