Musician signed up for a monthly streaming music service like Spotify called Musicstream. Under their agreement, Musicstream automatically charged Musician's credit card $9.95 on the first of each month for that month's services. The agreement could be cancelled by Musician for any reason, but he had to give thirty days' notice to do so. Musician had checked out Spotify, which had a promotion going which allowed immediate cancellation with no extra payment, but Musician liked Musicstream's music library better, and signed up with that company. Musician was fired from his latest gig and so wanted to trim expenses. He e-mailed Musicstream on February 2 to cancel his account and to promise truthfully that he would no longer listen to any music from the service. Musicstream responded by telling him in a return e-mail that he would be charged for February, but that he would be charged for only one day in March. Musician wanted the charges stopped as of February 1. If Musician sued Musicstream in small claims court for a refund of the last $9.95 charge on his credit card for the period between February 2 and March 1, Musician should:
(A) Prevail, because the terms of the Musicstream agreement are unconscionable.
(B) Prevail, because charging of the credit card is an unenforceable acceptance by silence or inaction by Musician of Musicstream's offer for services for thirty days.
(C) Lose, because Musician had given Musicstream reason to understand that assent for thirty days' worth of service may be manifested by silence or inaction.
(D) Lose, because there is no consideration to support Musicstream's promise since Musician never listened to any music on the service during that last thirty day period.