Landlord leased a commercial space to Tenant who wanted to use the space as a restaurant. The lease was for ten years and contained an "option to purchase" clause, allowing Tenant to purchase the property at the end of the lease term. The lease provided that the Tenant had to give notice of its intention to exercise the option six months before the lease ended, but contained no language about the purchase price or language indicating the parties agreed to agree on the price later. Tenant gave timely notice of its intention to exercise the option to purchase the building nine and a half years into the lease, but Landlord refused to sell, arguing there was no enforceable agreement as to the sale of the building because no price was set and no mechanism for determining the price was mentioned in the lease. In an action by Tenant against Landlord for breach of contract in a jurisdiction that follows the Restatement 2d, what is the likely result?
(A) Judgment for Tenant, and the sale must take place at a reasonable price.
(B) Judgment for Tenant, and the sale must take place at a price set by Tenant as winner of the action.
(C) Judgment for Tenant, but Tenant can only seek monetary damages as the terms are too indefinite to order specific performance.
(D) Judgment for Landlord, because there was no enforceable agreement as to the option due to indefiniteness.