Lincoln's reconstruction plan and the final Reconstruction plan passed by Congress, with a focus on their similarities and differences. These two plans represent distinct approaches to the process of rebuilding the nation after the Civil War and addressing the issues of reunification and the status of formerly Confederate states. Similarities: Both President Lincoln's plan and the final Reconstruction plan passed by Congress aimed to restore the Union and rebuild the Southern states. They both recognized the need for the Southern states to rejoin the Union and emphasized the importance of addressing the grievances of the South while also ensuring the protection of the rights of freedmen. Additionally, both plans included provisions for pardoning former Confederates who took oaths of loyalty to the United States and for the establishment of new governments in the Southern states. Differences: One key difference between Lincoln's plan and the final Reconstruction plan passed by Congress lies in the approach to the treatment of Southern states. Lincoln's plan was more lenient towards the Southern states, offering a relatively quick and easy path to readmission into the Union, whereas the final Reconstruction plan imposed more stringent requirements, including the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment and the establishment of military rule in some Southern states. Additionally, Lincoln's plan did not prioritize granting voting rights to freedmen, while the final Reconstruction plan included provisions for granting suffrage to African American men. Superior Plan and Proposed Changes: In considering which plan was superior, it is essential to recognize the context in which each plan was devised. Lincoln's plan was conceived during the war when the primary goal was to preserve the Union, while the final Reconstruction plan passed by Congress emerged in a post-war environment marked by greater emphasis on ensuring the rights and protection of freedmen. Given this context, the final Reconstruction plan appears more