contestada

Think back to some of the stories you've read in the last year or two. Of those, maybe you had one that you started to read, but you just couldn’t get into it. Why? What made you keep putting it down? On the other hand, think about a story you really enjoyed. What literary elements did the writer use to make it impossible to put down? For example, was the protagonist easy to relate to? Did the author describe the setting with such vivid detail that you felt you were right there? Authors will produce works that place more emphasis on one element than another. As a result, sometimes there are gaps in literary elements that typically appeal to you as the reader. Discuss some of the recent stories you’ve read that have missed the mark. What advice would you give to that author to fill in the gaps you felt were missing? Also give your opinion on some stories that you’ve really enjoyed. Explain the elements that make it a good story. For example, how did the author use character, symbolism, or point of view to create such a page-turner?

Respuesta :

SmartIdiots
A book that I love and have read more than 5 times is Number The Stars.A reason I absolutely love the book is because of the amazing description for the characters. I also feel deeply connected to the main character, Annemarrie, because I often have to risk it all to do what I know is right. One book I just was unable to finish is Why We Broke Up. I am simply unable to understand "romance" novels because I do not sit well with cliches. Overall, a good book is able to inflict emotions in readers and help picture a world much different than our own.

Creators will deliver works that put more accentuation on one component than another. Therefore, at times there are holes in scholarly components that commonly appeal to you as the peruser.

Explain the elements that make it a good story.

I as of late begun perusing a book called "The Mill on the Floss" written by George Eliot. I would have jumped at the chance to have kept perusing, yet I couldn't resist the opportunity to leave it.

That is on the grounds that I observed the portrayal excessively  with little to the ground and where nothing truly occurred.

I accept that this sort of portrayal isn't , yet I realize that it isn't suitable for my kind of perusing, since I favor an account more and with occasions that are immediately settled.

I mean to attempt to peruse this book again later on, when I am more experienced, as I accept that development will bring me tolerance for this kind of account. Likewise, I couldn't relate to the characters, which further reduced my advantage in the work.

From that point onward, I began perusing different stories. First I read a book called "Sickle" written by Neal Shusterman.

This book profoundly me primarily in the utilization of similitudes that the writer uses to discuss life, passing, the should be alive, the headway of science and innovation and how life turns into an issue when demise is forestalled.

It additionally made characters who convey with them numerous ideas that we can connect with our existence. Also, the story has a mind  secret and presents numerous verifiable figures.

I'm as of now perusing Jane Austen's "Pride and Prejudice", albeit the portrayal of this book is more unbelievable than the story utilized, I respect the manner in which the writer figures out how to make reactions of English society in 1812.

The writer involves incongruity as a steady scholarly asset that enhances his works and gives an extremely fulfilling corrosiveness in his books.

Furthermore, I like how the characters are all around portrayed and present contentions forward thinking, which shows that the writer's composing was a visionary and good composition.

For more information about George Eliot, refer the following link:

https://brainly.com/question/8974059

Otras preguntas