Daniel claims that any two right triangles can be proven to be similar by the sas similarity theorem because both have right angles that are congruent. what is his mistake?
SAS similarity theorem: When two triangles have
corresponding angles that are congruent and corresponding sides
with identical ratios, the triangles are similar. Two right angles are always congruent, but corresponding sides not always have identical ratios. For example, first right triangle has two legs of 3 and 4 lengths. Second triangle has two legs of 5 and 12 lengths. Then [tex] \frac{3}{5} \neq \frac{4}{12} [/tex]. That is the mistake.
