How did post-World War II independence movements in Vietnam differ from those in India?
A. India's movements sought to establish a communist form of government, while Vietnam's movements hoped to establish an independent democracy.
B. India's movements were supported by the country's former European leaders, while Vietnam's movements were fiercely opposed by Europeans.
C. India's movements were a unified effort led by one person, while Vietnam's movements were divided between dozens of different competing factions.
D. India's movements achieved independence through nonviolent protest, while Vietnam's movements only succeeded through violent conflict.

Respuesta :

D. India's movements achieved independence through nonviolent protest, while Vietnam's movements only succeeded through violent conflict.

India, led by Ghandi, was able to achieve independence from britian through peaceful means, while Vietnam was unified under the rule of Communist regime only through a bloody war.


Hope this helps

The post-World War II independence movements in Vietnam differ from those in India because D. India's movements achieved independence through nonviolent protest while Vietnam's movements only succeeded through violent conflict.

What is post-World War II?

The post-World War II serves as the era after the destruction impact of the world war.

However, the difference between post-World War II independence movements in Vietnam and that of India was that the Indian movement engaged in a non violent protest but Vietnam movement involved violence protest.

Learn more about post-World War II at;

https://brainly.com/question/651584