Respuesta :

altavistard

Answer:

No, not proportional

Step-by-step explanation:  

If Jace works 1 hour, he earns $20.  Were his earnings directly proportional to his hours, then he'd earn $40 for 2 hours' work, $60 for 3 hours' work, and so on.  But that's not the case; the table disagrees.  So:  NO, Jimmy's earnings are not proportional to the number of hours that he works.



OMGLUVU

Answer:

On the off hazard that Jace works 1 hour, he wins $20. Were his profit specially relative to his hours, at that point he'd win $40 for 2 hours' work, $60 for three hours' work, and so on Jimmy's earnings are no longer relative to the range of hours that he works.

Otras preguntas