Why was the Supreme Court’s decision on California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians significant?
A) It overturned laws restricting gambling on reservations.
B) It made gambling legal in California on certain days of the week.
C) It ended the sovereignty of Native American territories.
D) It banned gambling in California for 50 years.

Question

25-01-2019
History

contestada

Why was the Supreme Court’s decision on California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians significant?
A) It overturned laws restricting gambling on reservations.
B) It made gambling legal in California on certain days of the week.
C) It ended the sovereignty of Native American territories.
D) It banned gambling in California for 50 years.

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

Both renewable and nonrenewable resources are used within our society. How do the uses of nonrenewable resources compare to the uses of renewable resources? a.

mccarthyism was a term that came to signify

What is the difference between design and technique?

Different beverages may be absorbed at slightly different rates because of __________. The drinker's size The drink's size The drink's chemical make-up The time

This diagram shows about question 3 In this diagram, the forces on the runner and on the ground are equal. Why does the runner move forwards, yet the ground app

Santos believes that "silently screaming" is an oxymoron. Is he correct?

Which description of Andrew Jackson is correct? A.was the first common man elected president of the United States B.granted the Supreme Court the power of judi

How were the delegates to the Constitutional Convention chosen? A) by George Washington B) by the people C) by a lottery D) by state legislatures

East-West orbits are best for: military observation radio and television environmental studies remote sensing

What number is 5 more than negative 2?

palebadgworthy palebadgworthy · Answer 1 · 2019-02-03T20:01:04+01:00

The correct answer is A

California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians was a US Supreme Court landmark decision issued in 1987. It abolished laws which restricted gaming and gambling on Indian reservations. States desired to control gaming in reservations but this decision concluded that Indian gambling could only be restricted in states where all gaming activities were deemed criminal according to state law. It was considered unconstitutional, that the states tried to limit only certain type of gambling activities and not others.