Respuesta :

Yes , I do

As krauker learn more things about Mccandless life, Krauker felt that the hardship that Mccandless experienced is similar to his Experience.

This make Krauker became too emotionally attached when reviewing the life of Mccandless. He often make assumptions or creating conclusions about Mccandless that cannot be proven because he is using his own emotion to predict what Mccandless was thinking,.

Yes, Krakauer reads too much into McCandless's life as he got emotionally connected, felt they have the same life struggles and have taken risks in their life.

Who wrote into the wild?

Jon Krakauer wrote into the wild, it's about Christopher Johnson McCandless's life how he hiked to the wilderness of Mount McKinley in 1992,  donated his entire savings, and burned some and all about his life experiences.

Yes, I think Krakauer has emotionally read too much about McCandless's life,

  • He feels the hardship both have gone through is the same. They both think they understand the world.
  • He understands the risk of McCandless because he has also taken some life and death risks.
  • He is interpreting conclusions about Mccandless by predicting what Mccandless was thinking.

Therefore it can be said that yes, Krakauer has read too much into McCandless's life.

Learn more about into the wilds here:

https://brainly.com/question/25575450