Triangle 1 has vertices at (A,B), (C,D), and (E,F).

Triangle 2 has vertices at (A+1,B+3), (C+1,D+3), and (E+1,F+3).

What can you conclude about triangle 2?

A.) You cannot tell because you do not know where the points are in the plane.
B.) Triangle 2 is congruent to triangle 1 because a translation is a rigid motion.
C.) Triangle 2 is congruent to triangle 1 because a reflection is a rigid motion.
D.) Triangle 2 is congruent to triangle 1 because a reflection is a rigid motion.

Respuesta :

Answer:

Your answer would be B

Step-by-step explanation:

I say this because A is an understatement.

C and D are wrong because it's not a reflection.

The only logical answer to the question is B. Hope this helps

  • (\) QueTooOfficial (/)

Answer:

Answer is B

Step-by-step explanation: