Finally, read both of your poems and answer the following questions in a paragraph of at least 250 words. How has the message changed as a result of the format change? How have the mood, tone, and voice of the poem changed with the change of format? Which poem better conveys the message or theme? its for grass realism and war

Respuesta :

Answer:

Carl Sandburg's poem “Grass” is an unusual war poem in that it personifies grass. In the personification, the grass directly addresses the reader, placing the human perspective to the side. For example, Sandburg writes, “Pile the bodies high at Austerlitz and Waterloo. / Shovel them under and let me work -- / I am the grass; I cover all.” Grass, like human beings, is abundant, and from the perspective of grass, human life seems unimportant, and is therefore dismissed. This personification acts as a metaphor for how humans are treated in war.

Explanation:

In the first poem, the message of overcoming the past is expressed well, due to the poem format, but in the second poem, the poet has lacked in there due to a lack of rhyming.

What is a correct Poem Format?

A poem format includes rhyming the lines to give an essence of relatability and feel to the poem. A poem may include three to four lines and should be properly rhymed to explain its message well.

In the second poem, as the format of the poem changes, the feeling towards the freedom of thoughts and overcoming the past is gone.

Therefore, the first poem conveys a better message as it is written in the right format.

Learn more about Poem format, here,

https://brainly.com/question/1640133