The oxygen level of a lake suddenly starts decreasing. A biologist believes that photosynthetic organisms in the community have become less efficient at producing oxygen. A geologist believes that changes in the ground have increased the inflow of water into the lake. Why are both of these options valid scientific hypotheses?

Scientists with different educational backgrounds can come to different interpretations of the same data.

Both scientists have graphs and charts to support their hypothesis.

Both are valid because they are supported by experimental data

Both scientists underwent the same training and, therefore, have equally valid scientific hypotheses regardless of the available data.

A biologist is a scientist with specialized knowledge in the field of biology while a geologist is a scientist who studies the matter that make up the Earth as well as the processes that shape them.

Both scientists came to different interpretations of the same data since they have different educational backgrounds.

dd50 dd50 · Answer 2 · 2021-09-03T19:50:25+02:00

dd50 dd50

03-09-2021

Answer:

The Answer is A. Scientists with different educational backgrounds can come to different interpretations of the same data.

Explanation:

These aren't scientific facts that contradict themselves. These are only beliefs and hypothesis' of the scientists. Until one of the scientists prove each other wrong it will remain an unanswered question.

Hope This Helps!

Answer Link