AlvinD14
contestada


Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source
when analyzing a historical event?
O
A. To hear about the event from someone who was directly involved
O
B. To learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event
O
C. To see the event through the eyes of someone who witnessed it
O
D. To understand how people felt during the period when the event
happened

Respuesta :

Answer:

B.  To learn about conclusions of many other experts on the event

Explanation:

A,C, and D are all examples of first-hand experiences or accounts therefore meaning A,C and D are all primary sources rather than B which is the only secondary source.