Which is true of a study done by Terraciano and colleagues (2005) in 49 cultures on describing the "typical member" of a culture? The study was conducted using a single measure to assess personality and national character. There was relatively high disagreement about the national character perceptions of various cultures. The findings suggested that perceptions of national character may actually be substantiated by characteristics of members of those cultures. The respondents’ perceptions of national character were not correlated with the actual, aggregate personality levels of individuals of those cultures.

"The respondents’ perceptions of national character were not correlated with the actual, aggregate personality levels of individuals of those cultures."

Explanation:

A study done by Terraciano and colleagues (2005) in 49 cultures on describing the "typical member" of a culture can be well explained by the following statement which is, "the respondents’ perceptions of national character were not correlated with the actual, aggregate personality levels of individuals of those cultures".

batolisis batolisis · Answer 2 · 2020-03-26T14:56:49+01:00

Answer:

The respondents perceptions of national character were not correlated with the actual, aggregate personality levels of individuals of those cultures

Explanation:

The study done by Terraciano and colleagues ( 2005 ) in 49 cultures on describing the " typical member" of a culture. was about studying the four distinct personality traits of during the studies archaeological, ethnographical and it was revealed that the respondents perceptions of national character were not correlated with the actual, aggregate personality levels of individuals of those cultures. a personality assessment called DISC was used to conduct these four distinct personality traits