Which one of the following is unlikely to be an attractive and effective way to reduce the design, assembly, marketing, and other costs of UAV drones and help achieve a sizable competitive advantage over rival companies based on lower overall costs per UAV drone sold?

a. Paying PAT members minimal or no wage increases or incentives
b. Designing, assembling, and selling UAV drones having a competitive P/Q rating at a lower production cost than rivals
c. Trying to keep the warranty period to 60 days or 90 days (but no more than 120 days), if it is competitively feasible to do so
d. Switching to robot-assisted assembly methods to lower labor costs per drone assembled
e. Trying out numerous different combinations of design components, performance enhancements, and extra performance features to be used in the company's UAV drones in order to discover the lowest cost combination for achieving a competitively appealing P/Q rating

The statement i.e. not likely for attraction and effective for decreasing the design should be option c. The warranty period should be either 60 days, 90 days or 120 days.

Effective way for decreasing the design, cost:

For decreasing the design, assembling cost, marketing cost, and other tyep of cost with respect to the UAV drone also at the same time it help for accomplish the competitive advantage so for this the warranty period should not be more than 120 days in the case when it is competitive feasible.

Therefore, option c is correct.

Learn more about competitive advantage here: https://brainly.com/question/5647002?referrer=searchResults