Respuesta :
Answer:
I think it is
No, because there is a lot of variability in the geography book data
hope this helps
-lvr
No, Minnie is incorrect, because there is a lot of variability in the Planetary science book data.
Is this a valid inference?
We know that, for 25 samples of each book, we have:
Book mean median MAD
Planetary science 48.9 41 9.2
Math 34.5 44 1.9
The claim, is that "the Planetary science book as more words per page"
Notice that even if we subtract the mean standard deviation from the mean in the Planetary science case:
48.9 - 9.2 = 39.7
And we add these in the math case:
34.5 + 1.9 = 36.4
So, even considering the variability, the Planetary science book has more words per page.
The value in the Planetary science case is still larger, so, only with this, we conclude that her claim is not valid.
If you want to learn more about means;
brainly.com/question/14532771
#SPJ5