Answer:
The trial court is likely to Allowed the minor to cancel the contract
Explanation:
Doctrine of Stare Decisis which simply means Let the decision stand.
Therefore Doctrine of STARE DECISIS can be seen as a legal doctrine that said that a courts has to follow historical cases when they are making a ruling on a similar case.
In order word they ensures that the cases with similar event and facts are been approached in the same or similar way which means that the courts has to follow any legal precedents set by previous decisions just as in the case of between Peyton v. Quality Motors, where a state supreme court held that a minor could cancel a contract for the sale of a car, this mean that the case between Peyton v. Quality is an Historical cases and Now that a trial court in the same state is deciding Rikki v. Street Deals, Inc., a case with similar facts with Peyton v. Quality this means that the court have to use the case of Peyton v. Quality
Under the doctrine of stare decisis to decide on the case of Rikki v. Street Deals.
