Rachel states that -5.5 is an integer because it is negative. Is she correct. Why or why not?

Question

contestada

Respuesta :

mathstudent55 mathstudent55 · Answer 1 · 2020-08-25T00:36:22+02:00

Answer:

She is incorrect.

Step-by-step explanation:

She is incorrect.

An integer is a whole number, zero, and the opposites of the whole numbers. There cannot be a decimal part or fractional part to an integer.

Here are the integers:

..., -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, ...

-5.5 is not an integer.

Answer Link

swapnalimalwadeVT swapnalimalwadeVT · Answer 2 · 2022-08-22T13:12:48+02:00

Rachel's statement that -5.5 is an integer because it is negative is not correct because -5.5 is a rational number.

Given,

Rachel states that -5.5 is an integer because it is negative.

We need to find out whether Rachel's statement is correct and give a reason.

Integers are 0,±1, ±2, ±3, ±4, ±5, ±6, ±7, ±8,......

It includes all whole numbers.

We have,

-5.5 is a negative rational number.

Integer has no decimal point.

-5.5 is not an integer.

Thus Rachel's statement that -5.5 is an integer because it is negative is not correct.

Learn more about the difference between integers and rational numbers here:

https://brainly.com/question/13212492

#SPJ2