Which statement best explains how terrace farming differed from slash-and-burn agriculture?

Terrace farming was used to grow crops in mountain areas, while slash-and-burn agriculture was used to grow crops in rainforests.
Terrace farming was used to grow crops in rainforests, while slash-and-burn agriculture was used to grow crops in mountain areas.
Terrace farming allowed farmers to grow a variety of crops, while slash-and-burn agriculture could only be used to grow corn.
Terrace farming could only be used to grow corn, while slash-and-burn agriculture allowed farmers to grow a variety of crops.

The statement best explains terrace farming differed from slash-and-burn agriculture is Terrace farming was used to grow crops in mountain areas, while slash-and-burn agriculture was used to grow crops in rainforests.Thus the correct answer is A.

What is the importance of terrace farming?

Terrace farming plays a significant role as it helps in the conservation of soil and water by increasing the yield of crops and ensuring food security. It prevents soil erosion by binding the flow of water due to which fertilizers interact with water properly resulting in good crops.

Terrace farming usually grows crops in mountain areas as it gets sufficient slope over there which helps in better growth of the crop.

Slash-and-burn refers to burning trees to perform agricultural activities for a short span of time as the burning of land provides a nutrients layer that will be beneficial for good fertility.

Therefore, option A that terrace farming is used to grow crops in mountain areas whereas slash and burn agriculture including crops in rainforests is appropriate.

Learn more about terrace farming, here:

https://brainly.com/question/17379906

#SPJ5