read the sentence: Often, the presence of human beings in a wilderness area impacts the animals that live in that
area. Therefore, human beings should no longer be allowed in forests.
Which logical flaw is found in this argument?
A.
false causality
B.
self-contradiction
C.
oversimplification
D
circular reasoning

Respuesta :

Answer:

C. oversimplification

Explanation:

This argument is wrong because it gives an oversimplified solution to a complex problem, in other words, excludes important factors that can provide a more logical solution to the problem. The argument does not take into account that we all humans are logical and conscious creatures that can rethink the way we coexist with other animals so that they won't be harmed, and that through the implementation of specific actions we can have a positive impact on animals and nature.