Respuesta :
Answer:
Find the explanation below.
Explanation:
1. He drew the contrasts between death and rebirth when he explained that the contact which the new generation of children have with nature is dying. He explained that there is a possibility of a rebirth of wonder and joy where man can begin his meaningful interaction with nature.
Evidence from the text:
My sons may yet experience what author Bill McKibben has called "the end of nature," the final sadness of a world where there is no escaping man. But there is another possibility: not the end of nature, but the rebirth of wonder and even joy.
2. He drew a contrast between being broken and healing when he explained that the bond between the young and nature was broke. He also explained that nature did have a therapeutic effect as seen from some studies. Making it a point to heal the bond between the young people and nature would be beneficial to all.
Evidence from the text:
Yet, at the very moment that the bond is breaking between the young and the natural world, a growing body of research links our mental, physical, and spiritual health directly to our association with nature—in positive ways.
Reducing that deficit—healing the broken bond between our young and nature—is in our self-interest, not only because aesthetics or justice demands it, but also because our mental, physical, and spiritual health depends upon it.
Louv use contrasts—such as death and rebirth, broken and healing—to develop his essay's main ideas in the excerpt from Last Child in the Woods are :
Death and Rebirth:
- He drew the contrasts between death and rebirth when he clarified that the contact which the modern era of children have with nature is passing on.
- He clarified that there's a plausibility of a resurrection of ponder and bliss where man can start his significant interaction with nature.
Evidence :
- My children may however involvement what creator Charge McKibben has called "the end of nature," the ultimate pity of a world where there's no getting away man.
- But there's another plausibility: not the conclusion of nature, but the resurrection of ponder and indeed joy.
Broken and Healing
- He drew a differentiate between being broken and mending when he clarified that the bond between the youthful and nature was broke.
- He too clarified that nature did have a restorative impact as seen from a few considers.
Evidence :
- Yet, at the exceptionally minute that the bond is breaking between the youthful and the common world, a developing body.
Learn more about the "Last Child in the Woods":
https://brainly.com/question/18005660?referrer=searchResults
