skyla802806
contestada

The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people

a- under arrest as juveniles have many of the same rights as adults
b- accused of crimes have the right to a second trial upon request
c- who cannot afford an attorney must be provided one by the state
d- that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement

Respuesta :

jayilych4real

Answer:

d- that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement

Explanation:

The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement.

This was as a result of an arrest made by law enforcement officials who failed to read the Miranda rights to a suspect which was later challenged in court as inadmissible as evidence.

eeebud

Answer:

D.  that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement

Otras preguntas