Respuesta :
In
"The Devil and Tom Walker," Washington Irving describes how the devil
strikes a deal with a petty and miserly man, Tom Walker, and the
consequences of that deal. Irving uses a third-person omniscient point
of view to tell the story. This point of view allows the author to give
readers the private and intimate details about Tom’s life and character
that would not have been discernable from any other point of view. For
example, he describes Tom’s unhappy marriage:Her
voice was often heard in wordy warfare with her husband; and his face
sometimes showed signs that their conflicts were not confined to words.At
the same time, Irving is able to distance himself from the story while
dryly commenting on everything that happens. For example, he describes
Tom’s new business:In proportion to the
distress of the applicant was the hardness of his terms. He accumulated
bonds and mortgages; gradually squeezed his customers closer and
closer, and sent them at length, dry as a sponge, from his door.If
the story was told in the first person point of view (by the
protagonist Tom), the readers would get intimate but inaccurate details
about the story because it would be twisted by Tom’s biases. Through the
third-person omniscient point of view, the author is able to make
important commentary on the hypocrisy and greed in American society.************ From Plato
Answer:
In "The Devil and Tom Walker," Washington Irving describes how the devil strikes a deal with a petty and miserly man, Tom Walker, and the consequences of that deal. Irving uses a third-person omniscient point of view to tell the story. This point of view allows the author to give readers the private and intimate details about Tom’s life and character that would not have been discernable from any other point of view. For example, he describes Tom’s unhappy marriage:Her voice was often heard in wordy warfare with her husband; and his face sometimes showed signs that their conflicts were not confined to words.At the same time, Irving is able to distance himself from the story while dryly commenting on everything that happens. For example, he describes Tom’s new business:In proportion to the distress of the applicant was the hardness of his terms. He accumulated bonds and mortgages; gradually squeezed his customers closer and closer, and sent them at length, dry as a sponge, from his door.If the story was told in the first person point of view (by the protagonist Tom), the readers would get intimate but inaccurate details about the story because it would be twisted by Tom’s biases. Through the third-person omniscient point of view, the author is able to make important commentary on the hypocrisy and greed in American society.
Explanation: