contestada



The entire thrust of police interrogation . . . was to put the defendant in such an emotional state as to impair his capacity for rational judgment. . . [T]he choice on his part to speak to the police -- was not made knowingly

Respuesta :

Answer:

The responses to these question can be defined as follows:

Explanation:

Please find the complete question in the attachment file:

In the given scenario the court could not notify himself of their rights and thereby violates their Fourth Amendment or Self-incrimination as well as the Sixth Amendment, and as well as the right to an attorney, therefore Miranda could never make him a criminal without knowing that he might decline too.

Ver imagen codiepienagoya

Otras preguntas