Respuesta :
Answer:
E
Explanation:
Correct. In these comments, the author initially presents two contrasting perspectives on the changes in medical vocabulary: they could be seen as a positive sign of medical practitioners’ humility or a negative sign of their lack of principles. The author does not endorse either of these perspectives, however, but rather challenges their shared assumption that conventional medicine is “scientific” to begin with. The author thus rebuts the other perspectives discussed in the passage by introducing her own skeptical perspective on the scientific nature of conventional methods and providing new evidence to support her point of view.
The creator at first presents two differentiating viewpoints on the progressions in clinical jargon they should have been visible as a positive indication of clinical. correct answer is E.
Why Harvard magazine should be logical?
The creator doesn't underwrite both of these viewpoints, notwithstanding, but instead challenges their common supposition that customary medication is logical in the first place.
The creator accordingly disproves different viewpoints examined in the section by presenting her own distrustful point of view on the logical idea of customary strategies and giving new proof to help her perspective.
For more information about Harvard, refer the following link:
https://brainly.com/question/471527
