Please Hurry: Only answer if you are 100% sure). Read the passage. " I hope you are able to see the distinction I am trying to point out. In no sense do I advocate evading or defying the law, as would the rabid segregationist. That would lead to anarchy. One who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty. " Question 1) Why does King use the phrase " openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty " when describing how to break an unjust law? A) To describe all law breakers in a positive light, B) To highlight the difference between breaking just and unjust laws. , C) To demonstrate that people who break unjust laws are thinking emotionally, D) To suggest that no laws should ever be broken. ( Next Passage) " Since we so diligently urge people to obey the Supreme Court's decision of 1954 outlawing segregation in the public schools, at first glance it may seem rather paradoxical for us consciously to break laws. One may well ask: ' How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?" Question 2: Which phrase BEST helps the reader understand the word " paradoxical?" A) " Since we so diligently urge people to obey the Supreme Court's decision of 1954 outlawing segregation in public schools," , B) " One may well ask:" , C) " At first glance it may seem rather paradoxical for us consciously to break laws." , D) "How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?". ( Third Passage): A just law is a man made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. Question: Which word or phrase helps the reader understand the word " squares" as used in the sentence above? A) just law, B) the moral law, C) code, D) out of harmony. ( Will Mark Brainliest to whomever answers all 3 correctly). [ I will keep reporting people that just write down anything that doesn't pertain to my questions) Stop taking points away from students that can help and deserve the points please and thank you]

The King describes unjust law breakers with a positive tone. To break an unjust law comes with complete knowledge of the consequences with it and accepting it. Its not just an act of emotion, but a calculated act of strength.

Question 2) C.

Paradoxical : Its another word for contradiction. When the Supreme Court advocates in the "conscious breaking of laws" it helps you understand what Paradoxical means. The Supreme Court advocating for the knowing breaking of the law, that's a paradox. Its action or saying that makes no sense to what they said before.

Question 3) D.

If an unjust law is "out of harmony" with moral code, then when we read the first sentence, we take "squares" (which meas to fit into or be in line with) as Unjust Law's opposite.

I hope I helped. It's what I got from it.