Paul Stone sued his employer for assault and battery due to the actions of several of his female co-workers. While gathered around the coffee machine each morning, they would whistle at him, make lewd comments, and touch and pinch him. When the case was dismissed from the state circuit court, Stone appealed. The intermediate court of appeals sustained the result in the lower court, and Stone appealed to the state supreme court. When the state supreme court also sustained, Stone sought to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Are there any federal issues in this case that would allow the U.S. Supreme Court to take jurisdiction? What might prevent the nation’s highest court from doing so?

Respuesta :

There are no federal issues that give the U.S. Supreme Court jurisdiction over this lawsuit filed by Paul Stone against his employer for assault and battery by female employees.

  • Ordinarily, the U.S. Supreme Court does not entertain such lawsuits because they do not involve constitutional matters unless it chooses to.

  • Moreover, the state's supreme court has already upheld the dismissal of the case.  Paul Stone should rest the case.  Going too far results in loss of time and money.

  • Assault and battery involve the use of force to hurt a person.  This is not the case here.

Thus, the U.S. Supreme Court  may not find any constitutional issues in Paul Stone's case.

Read more about assault and battery at https://brainly.com/question/23397179

Answer:

No

Explanation: