Based on the explanation given in the scenario, since, the drawee repeatedly followed protocol for every transaction performed, then Art's entitlement to reimbursement would be valid for none of the cheques.
- The bank would not be held responsible for carelessness of the drawer and his failure to report vulnerabilities to his/her account.
- Since the thief was able to successfully forge Art's signature, then it is imperative that the drawer is paid.
- Transaction notification and statement were sent after each transaction and still Art made no report or compliant, hence, the bank would not be liable for any of his losses.
Hence, None of the withdrawals will be reimbursed.
Learn more : https://brainly.com/question/25575402