Respuesta :

annyksl

From the reading of the case, we can say that Dane deserved Restorative Justice.

We can arrive at this answer because:

  • Restorative Justice is a legal element contrary to traditional justice.
  • That's because restorative justice aims to put criminals through a system of restoration, rather than traditional imprisonment and punishment.
  • In this case, criminals are restored so that they can be returned to society, efficiently so that they contribute to the general good.

Dane was a juvenile criminal, who after being arrested for burglary, resisting arrest, illegally carrying weapons, and vandalism was sentenced to restoration through restorative justice.

Although Dane was a problematic person and a danger to society, his young age (16 years) places him as an individual with the potential to work for society.

For this reason, restorative justice proves to be a better option for him than traditional justice.

More information:

https://brainly.com/question/3889242?referrer=searchResults

Otras preguntas