mika64
contestada

So I’ve written the side for why I agree however I need help for why I would disagree so to rephrase the statement:

Food companies and advertising are not to be blamed……

So Ive written the side for why I agree however I need help for why I would disagree so to rephrase the statement Food companies and advertising are not to be b class=

Respuesta :

Answer:

Explanation:

Banning and partial banning of fast food advertising has been a cause for debate globally over the last few years. The call to ban has been in large part due to the influence these businesses have on childhood obesity rates. Another factor driving the debate is health issues in the general population from the consumption of fast foods. Diabetes, intestinal problems, and poor dental health are all contributed to by processed foods and high sugar content drinks that are the mainstay of fast food restaurants.

paynelove19

Answer:

Food companies and advertising are not to be blamed……

Children are exposed to mature content on a daily basis. This is why I believe it has negative consequences, such as forcing them to grow up faster, changing children's values and beliefs, and promoting junk foods and unhealthy lifestyles. As the years pass, so does the risk of sickness being diagnosed in children, which increases as the it comes to advertising and marketing, children are a heavily affected demographic. Nothing is simpler than appealing to children's wide-eyed gazes, but since they are so easy to entice, they are badly influenced by being blasted with a variety of alluring commercials.

Explanation:

So, you're asking for the negative side? This is my opinion why I would disagree.

Otras preguntas