Respuesta :
The statement which best explains why this excerpt is part of the plot’s exposition is:
Option B
- Mr. Utterson the lawyer was a man of a rugged countenance that was never lighted by a smile cold, scanty and embarrassed in discourse.
At cordial gatherings, and when the wine was as he would prefer, something prominently human beaconed from his eye something without a doubt which never tracked down its direction into his discussion however which talked not just in these quiet images of the later supper face, yet more often and uproariously in the demonstrations of his life.
He was grim with himself drank gin when he was separated from everyone else, to humiliate a preference for vintages and however he partook in the theater, had not crossed the entryways of one for a very long time.
In any case, he had a supported capacity to bear others now and then pondering, nearly with envy, at the high tension of spirits associated with their wrongdoings and in any furthest point leaned to help rather than to upbraid.
Almost certainly the accomplishment was not difficult to Mr. Utterson for he was undemonstrative at the best, and even his fellowship appeared to be established in a comparable catholicity of agreeableness.
It is the characteristic of an unassuming man to acknowledge his amicable circle instant from the hands of chance and that was the legal counselor's way.
His companions were those of his own blood or those whom he had known the longest this warm gestures, similar to ivy, were the development of time, they inferred no inclination in the article.
Consequently, most likely, the bond that unified him to Mr. Richard Enfield, his far off brother, the notable man about town. It was a nut to open for someone.
For more information, refer the following link:
https://brainly.com/question/25737075