defend either Hamilton's or Jefferson's view of democracy. You have to go beyond just stating their views. Why do you think their view is more beneficial to society? What is weak in the opposing view's interpretation of democracy?

Respuesta :

Answer:

The democratic decline is caused by the state-led weakening of political institutions that sustain the democratic system, such as the peaceful transition of power or free and fair elections. ... The latter forms of backsliding entail the debilitation of democratic institutions from within.

Hamilton's great aim was more efficient organization, whereas Jefferson once said "I am not a friend to a very energetic government." Hamilton feared anarchy and thought in terms of the order; Jefferson feared tyranny and thought in terms of freedom. The United States needed both influences.

Federalism Hamilton and Jefferson also disagreed about the power of the federal government. Hamilton wanted the federal government to have greater power than state governments. A strong federal government, he argued, was needed to increase commerce.

Jefferson's most fundamental political belief was an "absolute acquiescence in the decisions of the majority." Stemming from his deep optimism in human reason, Jefferson believed that the will of the people, expressed through elections, provided the most appropriate guidance for directing the republic's course. Everything is weak about democracy. :

Please brainlist. This should help you on your disccusion.