contestada

Use the five rules to determine whether the following are valid from the Boolean standpoint, valid from the Aristotelian standpoint, or invalid. For those that are invalid from either the Boolean or Aristotelian standpoint, name the fallacy or fallacies committed. Check your answer by constructing a Venn diagram for each.
i. No individuals sensitive to the difference between right and wrong are people who measure talent and succss in terms of wealth.
ii. All corporate takeover experts are people who measure talent and success in terms of wealth.
iii. Therefore, no corporate takeover experts are individuals sensitive to the difference between right and wrong.

Respuesta :

michell96

The statements presented would be valid from both the Aristotelian and the Boolean standpoint.

What are the principles that make statements valid or invalid?

Some principles to test is statements are valid or invalid are:

  • Universal prepositions are valid if they refer to existing elements (Aristotelian standpoint).
  • Prepositions are valid if the premises and conclusion are valid even if these do not refer to existing elements (Boolean standpoint).

Based on this, the statements presented would be valid from both the Aristotelian standpoint and the Boolean standpoint because the premises (I and II) are logically connected, and they refer to existing elements.

Learn more about logic in: https://brainly.com/question/4255659

Otras preguntas