contestada

Write a short essay comparing how "To Roosevelt" and The Squatter and the Don develop similar themes about power. For each text, provide two pieces of textual evidence: one that shows the theme emerging and another that shows its further development. Use the evidence and commentary you developed in part A to draft your response.

Respuesta :

You have been asked to do a short comparative essay. The first step is to ensure that you first research the text thoroughly.

What is a comparative essay?

A comparative essay is one that looks at two ideas and tries to highlight the similarities (compare) and differences (contrast) between those two ideas.

It is advised to always start with an introduction, then include a body, and then a conclusion.

Your introduction should be clear concise and must relate very logically to the topic you have been asked to evaluate.

Finally, ensure that your points are arranged in a logical sequence.

Learn more about comparative essay at:

https://brainly.com/question/24783136

Answer:

Both "To Roosevelt" and The Squatter and the Don address the theme that with power comes a responsibility to be careful and aware.In "To Roosevelt," Darío calls out the United States for being careless with power. Using personification, he says that when the United States" shakes itself there is a deep temblor/through the enormous vertebrae of the Andes." This figure of speech shows how small actions by the United States have a big impact in Latin America. Developing the theme further, he criticizes the United States for believing it can create progress through destruction: "You think . . . that progress is eruption," he says, bringing to mind an exploding volcano.In The Squatter and the Don, the carelessness of US power is represented by William Darrell, a prosperous settler who unknowingly stakes a claim on Don Mariano's land. Although he had promised his wife he would not squat on a Californio��s land, he is tricked into doing so by unscrupulous business associates, represented by Gasbang: "’This is what I call business,’ said Gasbang,. . . ‘and all inside of the law. That is the beauty of it—all perfectly lawful.’" Gasbang’s dialogue reveals that taking the Don’s land may be legal. But the narration of subsequent plot events suggests that Darrell’s claim is not ethical:The stakes having been placed, Darrell felt satisfied. . . . All would be done "according to law," in in this easy way more land was taken from its legitimate owner.Both writers suggest that the United States and its citizens should be more responsible with the power they wield, within US borders and beyond.

Explanation:

Make sure you paraphrase as this is the original answer in Edmentum....