The following excerpt is from researcher Erin Bryant's "Real Lies, White Lies and Gray Lies:
Towards a Typology of Deception" (2008). Read the excerpt carefully. Then write an essay that
argues your position on the circumstances -if any-under which lying should be considered
acceptable.
To group all lying into one category is misleading.
Some lies
... are trivial and may even
prevent someone from being hurt by an unnecessary truth. These harmless white lies have
been called a communication competence or "social lubricant" because they allow people to
censor negative thoughts and truths.
In your response you should do the following:
• Respond to the prompt with a claim that establishes a line of reasoning.
• Select and use evidence to develop and support your line of reasoning.
Explain the relationship between the evidence and your thesis.
• Demonstrate an understanding of the rhetorical situation.
• Use appropriate grammar and punctuation in communicating your argument.

Respuesta :

Are all lies the same?

What is lying, one might wonder? This refers to the absence of truth, for various reasons.

Yes, I agree with the prompt that not all lies are equal and not all are unnecessary.

Some lies are used to protect one and his loved ones from immediate danger and harm, some are used to cheat and to deceive, some lies are used to prevent someone from getting hurt over an uncomfortable truth.

Should they all be categorised as one?

I say no.

However, I must add that when lying to prevent an uncomfortable truth, the tag "harmless lie" is misleading and this should only be used when only necessary.

Lying to a loved one would hurt them more in the long run and you would lose your credibility.

Not so harmless now, is it?