No, it is not a violation of human rights
Because "luxury and convenience" aren't considered to be human rights. Even while the situation isn't quite fair you can't just assume that because a country has a working government, economy, and welfare system (which eventually allows for luxury and ease for a bigger portion of the population), it is better at managing its resources.
Due to budgetary limitations, it is occasionally feasible that not all human rights can be realized. For instance, Article 26 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights enshrines the right to education, notably the right to free and compulsory basic education, as a fundamental human right. There was heated discussion over ensuring the protection of this right when the Indian Constitution was being written.
Learn more about Human Rights here
https://brainly.com/question/1261546
#SPJ10
