Respuesta :
The basic argument is that it holds the employer legally accountable. It is opposed because it emerges as a result of an individual or a company's irresponsibility or other events that have damaged or destroyed another person or their property.
The basic argument for respondent superior is that it was developed to put the employer into legal accountability for the activities of the employees. This theory was established in the United States and gives an aggrieved party a stronger possibility of recovering damages caused by an employee of a certain business. This is because, under the respondent superior theory, the employer is accountable for the harm caused by an employee to a third party within the limits of his employment relationship.
The derivative theory of responsibility holds the employer liable for the negligence of his employee that causes injury to a third party. And direct theory of responsibility refers to the liability that arises over an individual or a company as a result of its carelessness or other circumstances that have hurt or destroyed another individual or their property.
To know more about respondent superior click here:
https://brainly.com/question/23416700
#SPJ4
