Option-D is the correct answer. They can conduct repeated experiments until they obtain data that support the claim.
A scientific argument is a method that researchers use to direct their work. In order to ultimately improve scientific explanations and experimental designs, scientists point out flaws and limitations in other people's arguments. Evidence-based arguments is the term for this technique. This part is structured around four components of scientific reasoning where students want more assistance: Evidence, reasoning, student interaction, and competing claims round out the four components.
Learn more about Scientific Argument here-
https://brainly.com/question/3997722
#SPJ9
Answer for me was 'A'
"They can analyze only the data related to the claim to see whether there are multiple possible explanations"
