Arnaldo is a researcher who develops a new hypothesis about the properties of electrons. He generates a hypothesis that goes against Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, a theory that has been supported by many experiments including those done by Neils Bohr. Arnaldo decides that he wants to test his hypothesis to see if data support it. He brings his teacher the following plan to test his hypothesis:
1. Research Heisenberg’s principle.
2. Recreate Heisenberg’s experiments.
3. Research Bohr’s wave-particle duality principle.
4. Recreate Bohr’s experiments.
What is wrong with Arnaldo’s plan? Researching and redoing previous experiments will not test a new hypothesis. Research is not involved in scientific inquiry.
Electrons are too small to have experiments done on them.
Bohr’s and Heisenberg’s experiments created laws that cannot be changed.

Respuesta :

The correct option is: Researching and redoing previous experiments will not test a new hypothesis; option A.

What is a hypothesis?

A hypothesis is an explanation which has not been proven or disproved, which is put forward to explain an observation.

A hypothesis can either be proved or dis[roved by conducting experiments whose result can then be used to prove or disprove the hypothesis.

In the hypothesis by Arnoldo about the properties of electrons. The hypothesis goes against Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. The Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle has been supported by many experiments including those done by Neils Bohr.

The problem with Arnoldo's plan to test his hypothesis is that Researching and redoing previous experiments will not test a new hypothesis.

In conclusion, the new hypothesis would be proved or disproved by new experimental methods.

Learn more about hypothesis at: https://brainly.com/question/12416923

#SPJ1