To protect themselves from their baser instincts, Hobbes believed that society needs to impose some rules and norms on its members.
On the contrary, Locke believed that a social compact was necessary to safeguard individuals' intrinsic rights.
As Locke saw it, people should have the option to rise up in opposition to the government if it does not protect their rights.
You'll find more information about this down below.
Explain who Hobbes and Locke are.?
While Locke and Hobbes both had an interest in natural law and social contracts, they did so from quite distinct scholarly traditions. Malmesbury, England-born Hobbes went on to become a major influence in Western philosophy.
Finally, according to Hobbes, a social agreement is necessary to protect people from the worst features of their nature.
Contrarily, Locke argued that a social contract was necessary to protect people's basic liberties.
According to Locke, if a government fails to protect its citizens' liberties, those citizens should have the option to abandon it.
If you want to learn more about Hobbes and Locke, check out this link: https://brainly.com/question/2552595
#SPJ1.
