Both actions of paying $20 for a watch from a local department store and paying $2,000 for a Rolex watch do not violate the law of demand.
The law of demand states that the higher the price, the lower the quantity demanded.
That is, there is an inverse relationship between demand and price.
Moreover, demand can be described as the quantity of a commodity that is affordable to buyers and they are willing to pay its price.
Janet pays $20 for a watch from a local department store because that is what she can afford. This does not violate the law of demand.
Megan pays $2,000 for a Rolex watch because he can afford it and he bought it purposely to impress people that he is rich.
Since paying $2,000 for a Rolex watch by Megan has no effect on the prices of watches in the local market, his action has not violated the law of demand.
Learn more about the law of demand here: https://brainly.com/question/10782448.
#SPJ1