Respuesta :
It meant that the federal judiciary, rather than the state courts, would ultimately become the primary venue for resolving disputes.
It all came from a really simple provision within the Judiciary Article of the Constitution, giving to the Court jurisdiction over "controversies between two or more states," and requiring that such suits should be begun originally within the Supreme Court and not in any tribunal. 1787.
Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to listen to a case) of the Supreme Court. In its 1890 decision in Hans v. Louisiana, the Supreme Court interpreted the Eleventh Amendment immunity broadly to ban suits against a state not only by citizens of another state, but also by a state's own citizens, and in cases arising under federal law.
Antifederalists viewed the law enforcement agency as a source of danger to individual liberty, the state judiciaries, and also the future existence of the states themselves.
The Constitution guarantees jury trials in criminal cases, but it said nothing about civil cases. There was no effective way to resolve disputes between states, like competing claims to the identical territory. Disputes between States decided by the Judiciary. powers of legislation.
learn more about jurisdiction: https://brainly.com/question/681072
#SPJ4
