contestada

In the case Mapp v. Ohio (1961), the Supreme Court overruled Wolf. V. Colorado, when it ruled that
evidence gathered illegally, could not be presented in a state court. Based on the court's ruling, In
Mapp v. Ohio, which of the following did the judges go against in their ruling?

In the case Mapp v Ohio 1961 the Supreme Court overruled Wolf V Colorado when it ruled that evidence gathered illegally could not be presented in a state court class=

Respuesta :

Based on the court's ruling, In Mapp v. Ohio Judges went against in their ruling of Judicial Review.

By a vote of 5-3, the United States Supreme Court decided in Mapp's favor. According to the supreme court, state courts cannot utilize evidence that was illegally obtained without a search order in criminal trials.

What's a Judicial Review?

  • A judge analyzes the legality of a public body's decision or action in a court case called judicial review. To put it another way, court reviews focus more on the process of decision-making than the merits or shortcomings of the outcome.

To Learn more about Judicial Review, Click the links.

https://brainly.com/question/966716

https://brainly.com/question/28179489

#SPJ9