Judicial Restraint is the philosophy of limiting
A philosophy of judicial interpretation called "judicial restraint" urges judges to keep their own power under check. In summary, judges must interpret the law rather than get involved in determining public policy.
The true purpose of the people who established the constitution should always be taken into consideration by judges when making decisions. If a prior court has made a ruling on a similar or closely comparable matter when a court is faced with a legal argument, the court will follow that precedent when making its conclusion.
For instance, a court's decision to overturn a legislation, using the authority granted to it by the power separation may be seen as activist.
To know more about philosophy of limiting decisions, visit the link:
https://brainly.com/question/28564845
#SPJ4
