contestada

The Constitution gives the President the power of appointment, but nominations must be approved by the Senate. It also gives the President the power to remove any officer he appointed without Senate approval, except federal judges. This topic was discussed greatly in the First Congress. Many argued that if Senate approval was required for appointment, it should also be required for removal. Explain whether you think Senate approval should or should not be required when the President exercises the removal power. Support your idea with at least one reason.

Respuesta :

ogorwyne

The reason why I think the power of the senate also has to be involved in the removal of a person that was appointed by the president is in order to ensure that the person that is being removed is out for the right reasons and also go through the time that they have spent in office.

Why the appointees are approved by the senate?

The senate of the nation would have to ensure that all of the people that the president has nominated have gone through a session of scrutiny in order to assess the person well enough.

In this case, while the person is to be removed, the senate should also be able to assess the time that the person spent in office and the work they did. This would ensure that the person is able to pass off as a good appointee during their time in office.

Read more on  power of the senate here: https://brainly.com/question/26823952

#SPJ1

Otras preguntas