Respuesta :
If there are specific, articulable facts that would make a reasonable police officer believe that criminal activity is taking place, the police may detain someone for questioning momentarily. They need to have solid suspicions.
What does the US Supreme Court mean by "reasonable suspicion"?
As a result, the Supreme Court acknowledged the idea of "reasonable suspicion." The Court ruled that an officer may stop a person and ask them questions if the officer has a "reasonable suspicion"—one that he can justify with facts—that the person has done or is about to commit a crime.
If, after considering all the relevant facts and circumstances, a reasonable police officer would have the same suspicion, then the police officer may have reasonable suspicion that a crime is being committed. Physical evidence is not necessary for the police officer to have a solid basis for suspicion.
Learn more about "reasonable suspicion.": https://brainly.com/question/10649559
#SPJ4
