In Zurcher v. Stanford Daily, the court determined that (1) a search is not unreasonable if the items sought are not in the possession of the suspect, and (2) the search should not interfere with the performance of actions protected by the First Amendment.
In agreement, the Court of Appeals. Held: 1. The Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments do not prohibit a State from granting a warrant to search property for evidence just because the owner or holder of the property in question is not a person who could reasonably be expected to be involved in criminal activity.
Unreasonable searches and seizures are forbidden by the Fourth Amendment in the United States. This generally means that without a warrant or other valid reason, police cannot search a person or their property. Arrests and the gathering of evidence are also covered.
Learn more about Fourth Amendment: https://brainly.com/question/28246295
#SPJ4
